Tomorrow night will be our next regularly scheduled Council meeting. You can find the complete agenda here.
As you may recall, we’ve been in closed session negotiations with the Irvine City Employees Association (ICEA) for months now. The results of those negotiations are now public. As I’ve said often, I’m not on the City Council to pick fights but I am here to get something done.
I question Irvine’s path: In a time when the public demands we require our public employees to live more like employees of the private sector — contributing to their own benefits and retiring at a later age — why has the City of Irvine chosen, essentially, to do nothing?
I hope many of you will consider attending the City Council meeting at 5 p.m. on Tuesday, July 26 at City Hall 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine to raise your voice.
It is the job of your city council to protect taxpayer dollars and serve as strong stewards of the public money; I have pledged since the beginning of my term more fiscal responsibility and transparency in Irvine City government with an ongoing focus toward safety and schools. Ultimately, the City of Irvine has given the Irvine City Employees Association a 1.8% base salary raise in order to “help” them contribute to their retirement and will protect them from layoffs for the next two years. For future employees, the retirement benefit will be slightly less than today’s employees, and be 2% based on the three-year highest average salary, but the retirement age will be 55.
Are you retiring at 55? Will you be collecting a pension almost totally paid for by your company? I am surprised by my colleagues’ decision not to require more of our City employees. At a time when Irvine families and families everywhere are struggling financially, we should do better by our Irvine taxpayers.
Let me know your thoughts. Email me at JLalloway@CityofIrvine.org.






















Follow Me!